Activist Speak Out On Maryland's Climate Action Plan

In the past eight weeks, over 200 Marylanders attended and testified before the Maryland Climate Commission. The Maryland Climate Commission held listening sessions across the state to report on the progress of Maryland’s Climate Action Plan and also to learn how people across the state want to address climate change in their communities.
Maryland’s Climate Action Plan was borne out of the 2009 passage of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act (GGRA), which created over 150 programs and policies designed to cut our state’s greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2020. This GGRA law must be renewed in 2016. Without action from the Maryland General Assembly, the state will lose its legal mandate to cut greenhouse emissions and implement the programs that will protect Maryland for generations to come. CCAN is mobilizing activists to call on our state legislators to renew and strengthen the GGRA. One of the most critical ways we can strengthen our plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions — and the top recommendation in Maryland’s Climate Action Plan — is to increase the state’s clean energy standard to 25% by 2020.
The climate commission could have walked away empty handed, without any input from everyday citizens – yet you made sure that didn’t happen. Across the state, climate activist, labor, faith and elected leaders spoke out with one clear message: Maryland must do more and can do more to address climate change in our state. This was a critical step in ensuring that Maryland’s Climate Action Plan is renewed. The Climate Commission, along with the Maryland Department of Energy, will be issuing a report to the Hogan administration and our state legislators this fall to help shape Maryland’s next steps.
The first meeting was held in Baltimore City in a small library meeting room. City Councilman Jim Kraft decried Governor Larry Hogan’s nixing of the funding for the red line and the lack of opportunities for economically down-trodden Baltimore to be a transit-oriented community. He was joined by Cheryl Arney, who held up a picture of her granddaughter along with a report predicting the rising sea levels along Maryland’s coast line and talked about the price of inaction. Representatives from Fuel Fund spoke out about how weatherization and improving the energy efficiency of low and moderate income households would have a lasting impact on our climate. Funds for these weatherization projects are possible due to programs outlined in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act and Maryland’s Climate Action Plan.
On the Eastern Shore, a small group of dedicated activists championed strengthening Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act and increasing Maryland’s clean energy standard.
In Western Maryland, Engage Mountain Maryland, local elected officials and Senator Roger Manno showed up to have their voices heard. Members of Engage Mountain Maryland spoke of their opposition to fracking and declared that it should not be a component in any climate action plan due to the unknown health and environmental risks. They also shared studies that show the emissions from fracked gas worsens climate change and is far worse than coal for the climate. Senator Manno decried Governor Larry Hogan’s refusal to publish the new rules on coal fired power plants. Local residents spoke of their love for the landscape of Western Maryland and how they feared that fracking would poison their communities.
In Southern Maryland, Cove Point activists spoke stridently against the export facility in Lusby and the impacts that it would have on their health.  One activists spoke out and stated that if everyday citizens had to curb their pollution through vehicle emissions and other legal mandates, than coal power plants need to have mandates to curb their own pollution.
The climate commission listening sessions culminated in Prince George’s County. Delegate Dereck Davis pledged to rise above partisan politics and work to have the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act passed through the House of Delegates. Delegate Joseline Pena-Melnyk, challenged everyone in the room to call, show up to hearings and ensure that their legislators felt grassroots pressure to pass the renewal of the GGRA and fight for clean energy policies. Over 96 people attended the Prince George’s County climate commission listening session, leaving an undeniable impression on the climate commission that citizens from across the state want to see Maryland be a leader in confronting the climate crisis.
To add to the flood of voices demanding that the Maryland Climate Commission work to strengthen and renew Maryland’s Climate Action Plan — submit your comment today!

Two Years to Victory: MD Gears Up to Win Permanent Protections Against Fracking

“I thought you all would be taking long vacations this summer!” exclaimed a CCAN supporter, when I called to invite her to an organizing meeting happening this July in her community regarding the future of fracking in Maryland.
She was referring to the big news coming from Annapolis this April, when concerned citizens across the state pushed elected officials to pass the first legislative moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in the country. But this significant win will only last for two years, which means every Marylander — parents, students, business owners, concerned citizens — has two years to organize and secure permanent, statewide protections against fracking.
The passage of a legislative moratorium was a huge testament to the power of public participation in government. As WBAL reported on the Friday that the bill first passed the Maryland Senate, “opponents of fracking seem to have out-demonstrated, out-lobbied and outdone those who support the controversial process.” Indeed, the “Don’t Frack Maryland” coalition, comprised of over 200 groups across the state, turned out more calls and emails than legislative offices had ever seen on the fracking issue. And nearly 400 constituents came to Annapolis over the course of 3 months for lobby meetings, rallies, press conferences, and to deliver information to legislators.
While the moratorium guarantees that no fracking permits can be issued in Maryland for two years, it was drastically altered from the bill our advocates wrote. A provision establishing a new panel to review health and economic studies was cut. The final version also requires the Maryland Department of the Environment to adopt regulations for hydraulic fracturing by October 2016, which would then be effective as soon as the moratorium expires in October 2017. Simply stated: the next two years is not a time to wait and see what happens. It is a hard deadline on a frack-free Maryland. By the end of 2017, our state could open for business in the eyes of the gas industry.
That’s why CCAN is building a groundswell of support across the state, engaging Maryland residents in campaigns to enact permanent measures to ban fracking in their own communities.
In Prince George’s County, CCAN and our allies are working with Councilwoman Mary Lehman to introduce a county ordinance to ban fracking. Southern Prince George’s County sits on top of the Taylorsville gas basin. A Texas-based company has already leased land for fracking just across the Potomac River in the Virginia portion of this same basin, making Prince George’s one of the most vulnerable counties outside of Western Maryland to potential gas extraction. More than 70 county residents packed the Greenbelt Public Library last Tuesday night to learn about the threat fracking poses to Prince George’s County. Hundreds have already signed a petition to the council, and CCAN volunteers are hitting the streets to secure support from small businesses and other community leaders. Meanwhile, in Baltimore City, Councilman James Kraft has introduced a resolution endorsing a statewide ban.
This is our game plan: Where there’s gas, we’ll pass local laws to keep it in the ground. Where there isn’t gas, we’ll pass resolutions telling our state legislators they need to prohibit drilling statewide and KEEP IT IN THE GROUND, all building momentum toward passing a permanent statewide ban.
We know that fracking poses dangerous threats to public health, with more damning scientific evidence coming out every passing month. Fracking causes real estate values to plummet and puts an enormous strain on rural infrastructure like roads and bridges. Idyllic, pastoral communities all over the United States have been scarred and abandoned in fracking’s wake. The drilling process takes hundreds of millions of gallons of fresh water and leaves behind irrevocably polluted land, air, and waterways. There is no proven way to regulate this process to protect humans and the environment from these harms.
We also know that the gas industry has shown time and again that it does not care about the havoc it wreaks.
We have a powerful movement putting wind in the sails for a permanently frack-free Maryland. But we’re going to need to keep educating, inspiring, and bringing new voices and communities into this movement to ultimately win.
Want to get the latest updates, and learn how you can get involved this fall? Join us on September 9th at 7:00pm for the Maryland activist conference call. CCAN organizers and volunteers across the state will come together to discuss our big campaign plans this fall — including building the movement for clean energy alternatives to fracking — and how you can get involved!

Help Elevate the Pope's Call on Climate this September in DC

Pope Francis is coming to Washington, D.C., arriving September 22nd and taking part in activities through the 24th. He will be in the United States until the 27th.
A growing coalition of faith-based, environmental, climate, social justice and other groups has come together and is planning a variety of activities leading up to and during the week that this inspiring and courageous world leader will be in town. This pope has been outspoken about the urgency of the climate crisis and its connection to the larger environmental, social and economic crises of our time. It is important that we who share his concerns take visible action to support him and amplify his message.
Beyond Extreme Energy begins the activities with a planned 18-day, water-only “Fast for No New Permits” in front of FERC, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. It will begin on Tuesday September 8th and continue until Friday the 25th, which is the day after the Pope’s speech to Congress. CCAN National Campaign Coordinator Ted Glick will be one of those taking part in this action. On September 9th and 10th BXE fasters will be taking part in activities with Grandparents Climate Action.
CCAN and BXE are working with the Franciscan Action Network, which is planning a fast September 14-23 at McPherson Square. The fast is part of an international fast organized by the Global Catholic Climate Movement. Their fast will end the evening of September 23rd with an interfaith service at the Lincoln Memorial.
On the evening of September 22nd Jewish Rabbis will lead an evening Yom Kippur Day of Atonement/At-Onement service at the Lincoln Memorial.
The big day is September 24th. That morning Pope Francis will speak before Congress. Outside on the mall Moral Action for Climate Justice is organizing a rally with a broadcast of the Pope’s speech, and a program of music and speakers before and after. The National Park Service and other police agencies expect hundreds of thousands of people to be present on the mall that morning.
And on September 25th, as the Pope speaks in NYC before the United Nations, people will flood Capitol Hill to call upon Senators and House members to finally get serious and move forward to take action on climate. Later in the day, Beyond Extreme Energy is organizing a gathering at FERC as the fasters end their fast and as religious leaders attempt to take copies of Pope Francis’ “Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home” into FERC to deliver to the five FERC Commissioners.
CCAN looks forward to all of these activities next month and urges our members and supporters to take part in as many of them as you can. It’s time for moral action for climate justice!

Hands Across Our Land Takes Richmond. Calls on Governor McAuliffe to Do His Job

This post was authored by CCAN’s new volunteer Richmond Pipeline Coordinator, Chelsea Norman.
Stand With Virginians, not with Dominion” — that’s what echoed through the streets of downtown Richmond on Tuesday as CCAN and our allies participated in the first Hands Across Our Land pipeline resistance march.
This August marks one year since the first informational meetings Dominion Power held in Augusta, Buckingham, and Nelson counties for their proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. It also marks one year of growing pipeline resistance across Virginia.
I started as a volunteer with CCAN a week ago, and the dedication to protecting Virginia’s climate from shortsighted fossil fuel projects like these is abundantly clear. Made up of landowners and their allies, business owners, faith leaders, students, lifelong climate activists, artists, and concerned citizens, a community has been born that is resisting new natural gas infrastructure right in the heart of Dominion-ruled Virginia.
Three proposed pipelines: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Mountain Valley Pipeline, and the lesser known Atlantic Connector — together these spell disaster for our lands, our coast, and our climate. That’s why over fifty people came out to join hands Tuesday and urge Governor McAuliffe to withdraw his support of these disastrous pipelines.
Two of the inspiring people that came out Tuesday were Will Barr and his mother-in-law Lisa Tulley, who are currently being sued by Dominion for denying the company approval to survey their land. Surveying seems like such a small act, but in reality it consists of a myriad of inspectors, large crews on the property and digging for about a week’s time.
“For me, in addition to the environmental effects, it’s about property law. It destroys the community, it’s dangerous and I can’t control what’s happening to my own property — something I’m supposed to be able to protect.” Barr and his wife own eight mountainside acres in Nelson County’s Horizon EcoVillage. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline will cut across their property, along with eleven other lots in the village and 40 acres of public land. According to Barr, spreading across these lots is a wetland that hosts a rare tree breed as well as an endangered species that Dominion’s environmental representatives plan on trapping,. Barr’s mother-in-law is particularly concerned about water: “It’s going to intersect five aquifers that serve our well system. My biggest concern is the quality of our drinking water. What happens if there’s a leak?”
Today’s event was one of 15 Hands Across Our Land events across Virginia – including one in nearly every county threatened by these proposed projects, and one of 30 nationwide. This coordinated day of action was conceived by organizers at the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League and supported by dozens of Virginia groups. The Richmond event was coordinated by BREDL, CCAN, Virginia Sierra Club and the Virginia Student Environmental Coalition (in their first major action of the new school year).
https://twitter.com/BelEsprit92/status/633681476651982848/video/1
 
As a unified community we stood, hands clasped, banners waving, and urged Governor McAuliffe to withdraw his support of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Mountain Valley Pipeline.  He has said before that there is nothing he can do about these pipelines, but that is far from true. He can stand with Virginians, not with Dominion and their allies. He can stand with the property owners whose land will be destroyed and whose property values will plummet, and the low-income communities whose health will be impacted by compressor stations and other dirty infrastructure projects
IMG_20150819_001511James Freeman, a Richmond resident and Virginia mountain hiker was in the crowd today. In one hand he held a “Protect Our Virginia” sign and in the other he held the clearest symbol for Hands Across Our Lands – his eight-year-old son Dylan’s hand. “We must think of our future generations who will reap the repercussions of our decisions.”
What’s next? In September, we expect Dominion to file for the Certificate of Public Necessity and Convenience, i.e. their permit to start construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Virginians from Highland to Chesapeake are gearing up to respond, and so are we here at CCAN. Stay tuned for more.
 

Hampton Roads speak up! Share your climate change story with Flood of Voices

Today we, along with our partners at Virginia Organizing and Virginia Sierra Club, are inviting you to check out and join the “Flood of Voices,” a new website dedicated to the stories of coastal Virginians being impacted by rising tides and flooding, especially those whose voices are not normally heard.
See the stories your neighbors have contributed so far here.
Then, join the Flood of Voices by sharing your own! Click here to get started.

The Flood of Voices project began in March, when Virginia Organizing brought the South Hampton Roads community together for a series of events to share and collect stories of flooding in low-income neighborhoods.
Everyone has a story, from Tuere Brown (above) who was stranded on a washed out road trying to take students home from a flooded school, to Peggy Stamoulis, who put herself in the path of flood waters because she needed a job. These voices are important, and tell the story of daily life in Hampton Roads.
We know personal stories are the most effective way to inspire action and build a strong movement against climate change. CCAN, Virginia Organizing and Virginia Sierra Club are using these stories to educate and organize across Virginia and build the support we need to win solutions for our families — like passing the Virginia Coastal Protection Act. The stories of our neighbors in Hampton Roads play a huge role in influencing our legislators and show that climate change isn’t a crisis for our grandchildren, it’s a crisis for us right now.
On August 3, the Environmental Protection Agency released the final version of its Clean Power Plan. The Plan will reduce carbon emissions that are fueling climate change and sea level rise while increasing development of wind, solar and efficiency.
The EPA rules leave it up to Virginia to decide how to cut fossil fuel pollution. Over the past year, CCAN activists like you have been building momentum behind a win-win solution: Passing the Virginia Coastal Protection Act to join the nine-state Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, or RGGI. This bipartisan state legislation would cap carbon pollution in Virginia and raise up to $100 million annually to fund flooding protection measures in our hardest-hit neighborhoods.
In the U.S., the Hampton Roads region is second only to New Orleans as home to the most people at greatest risk from flooding caused by rising sea levels. Residents are already seeing the consequences – living on the front lines of climate impacts driven by fossil fuel industry pollution. Chronic flooding is forcing the raising of homes, roadways and naval infrastructure, and it’s only getting worse. Scientists predict that sea levels could rise by as much as seven feet within this century. In the event of a major storm, there is no effective plan to evacuate and shelter residents, even as warming ocean temperatures and longer hurricane seasons increase the risk of superstorms like Sandy.

We must act now to protect coastal Virginia from the impacts of climate change, and a “flood of voices” is rising up to demand change.

Everyone has a story to tell: how has flooding impacted your life? We want to know! Share your story with us by filling out this form and we’ll follow up with you.
 

From CCAN’s General Counsel: Update on Cove Point Legal Fight

While groups on the ground in Calvert County continue to stand up to Dominion’s massive liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal along the Chesapeake Bay, the fight is simultaneously moving forward in federal court.
On behalf of CCAN, Patuxent Riverkeeper, and Sierra Club, and their members who will be harmed by Dominion’s project, Earthjustice asked the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on May 7th, 2015 to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) decision to approve Dominion’s LNG export project without a valid environmental review. Our lawsuit centers on FERC’s unlawfully narrow environmental review of Dominion’s massive project to convert its virtually idle LNG import facility into a hub for LNG exports. That review—criticized in over 150,000 citizen comments—omitted credible analysis of the project’s lifecycle global warming pollution, along with all the pollution associated with driving demand for upstream fracking and fracked gas infrastructure; its impact on water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and risk to the critically endangered North Atlantic Right Whale; and potentially catastrophic explosion and fire threat to hundreds of nearby residents.
Our legal fight to stop the $3.8 billion export facility began within FERC itself. CCAN members joined thousands of others in submitting comments to FERC on Dominion’s application and the agency’s environmental review of the project. After conducting the minimum review allowed under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), FERC approved the proposal on September 29th, 2014. Concerned that the agency had not fully considered the many ways that Dominion’s LNG export project will impact the environment and threaten community health and safety, CCAN and its partners, with the help of Earthjustice, asked FERC to review its decision. FERC sat on our request for months—a process known as “tolling”—even as it approved order after order allowing Dominion to begin construction. After seven months, FERC finally denied our request. Once we completed FERC’s internal review process (or “exhausted our administrative remedies,” in legal jargon), we were finally able to challenge the agency’s decision in federal court.
Tragically, FERC’s foot-dragging allowed Dominion’s bulldozers to start construction before residents were able to appeal to the federal court. Citing the fact that Dominion’s construction activities have already begun to irrevocably damage the landscape and quality of life in Calvert County, Maryland, CCAN, Patuxent Riverkeeper, and Sierra Club asked the D.C. Circuit in June to halt all construction while our case was pending. Injunctions are difficult to obtain, and the court ultimately denied our request, but that decision has no bearing on the merits of our case.
Environmental groups are not the only ones who are challenging FERC’s decisions regarding Cove Point. Before Dominion proposed to expand and convert the terminal, Cove Point was a mostly dormant import facility. Energy companies, including BP, Statoil, and Shell had contracts to import natural gas to the terminal. Dominion granted Statoil the opportunity to relinquish its import capacity, but did not grant BP or any other importer the same opportunity. Signaling that the import market is uncertain, BP has asked the DC Circuit to review this denial, and BP’s case has been consolidated with ours.
We do not yet have a briefing schedule for the consolidated cases, but hope it will allow for argument in the court’s spring term. FERC has failed its important duty under NEPA to analyze and disclose the environmental consequences of allowing Dominion to build and run a facility that can export up to nearly 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. FERC must stop cutting corners when it comes to our fragile climate and environment. Our lawsuit is a step towards pushing FERC in the right direction.

Residents of Buckingham Say NO to Proposed Compressor Station

This is a guest post from Virginia Atlantic Coast Pipeline Fellow, Nqobile Mthethwa, you can reach her at NqobileM@chesapeakeclimate.org.
Over 50 people gathered at the Frances Redwood Center on July 22nd to discuss the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Compressor Station in Buckingham County. The seminar was a joint effort by Friends of Buckingham, Chesapeake Climate Action Network and Yogaville Environmental Solutions. This seminar was presented to the annual session of the United Baptist Association of Central Virginia.
The presentation gave an overview of the proposed 550 mile and 42 inch Atlantic Coast pipeline and the rush for natural gas in the eastern region of the United States. Friends of Buckingham member Kenda Hanuman presented the dangers of compressor stations and what the proposed Buckingham station would mean for the community. Concerns ranging from toxic emissions, land rights, noise and light disturbances, and the creation of only 2 full time jobs from the station were all discussed.
Following the presentation, community members engaged by firing off questions about the proposed pipeline and compressor station. People were concerned how noise levels that accompany this type of infrastructure would affect sleep in this rural community. Many had pointed questions about the elderly people of Buckingham with compromised health issues including respiratory conditions. The elderly fear their lack of mobility could be detrimental in the event of leaks and explosions.

A packed house as citizens across Buckingham County came to learn about the proposed compressor station.
A packed house as citizens across Buckingham County came to learn about the proposed compressor station.

Many people had questions about the economics, specifically the outsourcing of jobs to out of state workers, the loss of land and depreciation of its value, and supposed tax benefits gained by the people of Buckingham being outweighed by health/environmental costs. Especially concerning was the difficulty of tapping into the gas to be used by Buckingham. Right now, if a county or business wanted to use gas from the pipeline, it would cost $5 – 8 million to ‘tap’ the line.
Citizens are troubled with the way Dominion is forcing their way onto private property by lawsuits against innocent citizens. Many people’s families have lived in Buckingham for hundreds of years. Dominion is willing to compromise the health and livelihood of Buckingham citizens for empty promises of cheap natural gas and economic benefits.
The general consensus among attendees was there is no benefit to Buckingham citizens or anyone else in the pipeline path, there are only costs to health, community and the environment. Further, they saw that natural gas isn’t a sustainable source of energy because the effects of climate change are predicted to get worse with the continued use of fossil fuels.
The more people learn about this project, the more people turn against the ACP. We see citizens of all faiths and regions in Virginia are standing together in opposition to the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and compressor station. Like the folks in Buckingham, people across Virginia have been and will continue to build coalitions to resist every point of the destructive proposed pipeline and compressor station. The Buckingham meeting has reaffirmed the belief that “Organized people will always win over organized money.”

Huge victory to keep ‘EmPOWERing’ Maryland

Last Thursday, the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) launched Maryland into the top tier of electricity-saving states by embracing one of the highest energy efficiency targets in the country. The order requires that Maryland’s electric utilities achieve annual incremental electricity savings of 2.0% of retail sales per year in perpetuity. The long-awaited decision, which CCAN’s policy experts pushed to make as strong as possible, gives a huge boost to the state’s “EmPOWER Maryland” program, which helps consumers save money while fighting climate change.
This is a big step forward with exciting promise — the new EmPOWER rules will require utilities to save over 1.2 million megawatt-hours per year. That’s the energy equivalent of closing a 460 megawatt coal-fired plant every two years, and will reduce carbon at levels equivalent to taking 173,000 cars off the road annually. To put that another way, the new EmPOWER rules will reduce carbon emissions at the same rate as building 470 megawatts of new wind power every year. That’s nearly three times greater than Maryland’s installed wind capacity today.
To put Maryland’s new goals into a national perspective, only two other states—Rhode Island and Massachusetts—achieved saving levels higher than 2% last year. In terms of future targets, Maryland’s new goals are among the top five in the country.
CCAN’s director, Mike Tidwell, was out in front of news coverage on the PSC decision, driving home its impact on WAMU and in the Baltimore Sun.
“The state of Maryland has just taken a huge step in showing that action on air pollution and climate change can go hand in hand with consumer savings,” said Tidwell, “The PSC deserves praise for hearing the public’s voice that efficiency is a win-win. We now hope other states will follow suit at this same high level.”

On Jan 17th, 2008, hundreds of activists rallied for climate action and solutions during the middle of a snowstorm in Annapolis.

In 2008, CCAN activists helped drive the campaign to pass the EmPOWER Maryland Energy Efficiency Act. That law, which set the goal of reducing energy use by 15% below 2007 levels by 2015, enabled consumer rebates and other incentives to invest in energy-saving measures. The PSC’s decision to expand and strengthen the EmPOWER program will ensure we continue making progress beyond 2015. This decision was three years in the making, and CCAN was an official intervenor in the PSC process, pushing for the strongest programs and goals every step of the way.
Looking ahead, the new EmPOWER rule will play a key role in meeting Maryland’s commitment to reduce global warming pollution by 25% by 2020 under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act. The state’s new efficiency commitment will help achieve Maryland’s Climate Action Plan. CCAN will be focused in the coming year on making sure we renew and strengthen other core elements of that plan — like continuing to increase our reliance on clean electricity sources like wind and solar.

RGGI Helps You Keep More $$$ In Your Pockets

Amazing things happen when states support the expansion of energy efficiency programs: electricity bills decline, fossil fuel pollution decreases, and the public at-large benefits. These were among the many conclusions of a highly anticipated report released last week by Analysis Group. The report studied the recorded costs and benefits of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) from 2012 through 2014 to the nine northeast states that voluntarily participate.
RGGI is a cooperative effort that caps and reduces carbon emissions from power plants. Power plants in participating states (from Maine to Maryland) purchase allowances for every ton of carbon pollution that they emit. RGGI states agree on how many pollution allowances to offer for sale each year, setting a declining cap, and the revenue from the sale of allowances is returned to individual states. (For a background explanation of RGGI, see this CCAN fact-sheet.)
In short, the report states that directing resources to energy efficiency programs “stands out as the most economically beneficial use of RGGI dollars.”
These findings are important, particularly due to the report’s timing. In a matter of weeks the Environmental Protection Agency is expected to finalize the rules of the Clean Power Plan which will require Virginia to cut its carbon pollution by over one-third within the next fifteen years. RGGI is a solution to the Clean Power Plan and could provide Virginians with numerous other benefits as well.

Analysis Group Report: In Detail

One very important detail: This new Analysis Group report focuses solely on the economic costs and benefits of RGGI. The report acknowledges that RGGI was originally formed for the expressed purpose of reducing fossil fuel pollution to combat climate change. RGGI certainly has benefits to the environment, public health, and other areas that the researchers don’t consider as a part of the scope of this study. Analysis Group measured only the impacts of RGGI on the economy in the nine participating states.

On Energy Efficiency

RGGI states’ successful usage of energy efficiency investments paved the way towards $460 million in total electricity bill reductions for consumers in the past three years, while lowering carbon pollution faster than these states expected. The report concedes that there are many other ways states benefited by participating in RGGI, which includes both direct and indirect costs throughout the region. On the whole, Analysis Group found that the enormous benefits to consumers via energy efficiency resources created through RGGI dramatically outweighed the costs of participation in the program.
Specifically, the report found the following:

“RGGI-funded expenditures on energy efficiency depress regional electrical demand, power prices, and consumer payments for electricity. This benefits all consumers through downward pressure on wholesale prices, even as it particularly benefits those consumers that actually take advantage of such programs, implement energy efficiency measures, and lower both their overall energy use and monthly bills. These savings stay in the pockets of electricity users directly.”

In short, RGGI-supported energy efficiency dollars save consumers money. According to the latest data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the average residential customer’s electricity bills in the nine RGGI states is $108.43. That figure is nearly $17 lower than the average monthly residential electricity bill Virginians pay of $125.36. The national average is $111.08.
Why do customers in RGGI states pay lower electricity bills than customers in Virginia? The answer is simple: customers in RGGI states use a lot less electricity. Again referencing the latest EIA data, the average residential user’s energy consumption in RGGI states is 702 kilowatt hours (kWh) per month, far below Virginia’s average consumption in the residential sector of 1,156 kWh monthly. The national average is 909 kWh monthly.
Statewide energy efficiency programs like lighting and appliance upgrades, home insulation inspections and improvements, and general consumer efficiency education all help customers consume less electricity, which ultimately reduces customers’ bills and decreases fossil fuel generation and pollution. Customer bills in RGGI states are lower than the national average even though electricity rates in RGGI states are indeed higher than the national average. The important factor is electricity consumption, and it’s a fact that RGGI leads to less energy consumption and consumers in RGGI states use less electricity than Virginians.
Critics of RGGI and the Clean Power Plan argue that they’re too costly. However, independent studies and documented government data strongly suggest the opposite. If done correctly, Virginia can craft its plan of compliance in a way that is extremely cost-effective and actually lowers bills for consumers. RGGI is the smartest path forward for Virginia.

Other RGGI Benefits

Even though Analysis Group concludes that energy efficiency provided the most “bang for your buck” and produced the most direct economic value to consumers, the report points out that states have been increasingly more creative in the use of RGGI dollars to advance various state priorities.

“The states’ use of allowance proceeds not only provide economic benefits, but also has helped them meet a wide variety of social, fiscal and environmental policy goals, such as addressing state and municipal budget challenges, assisting low-income customers, achieving advanced energy policy goals, and restoring wetlands, among other things.”

Sea level rise from climate change is threatening our coast. Electricity bills in Virginia are among the nation’s highest. The EPA is requiring states to reduce their carbon footprint for the public’s health and welfare. It’s time for bold, yet practical solutions in Virginia to meet these challenges.
We can begin solving all of these problems by joining RGGI and wisely reinvesting our allowance resources in adaptation, energy efficiency, and other statewide priorities. The evidence is here. The program works. Now we need the wisdom and resolve to join our neighbors by becoming the 10th state participating in RGGI.

Packed Room at Baltimore Kickoff for Statewide Climate Hearings

Cheryl Arney held up a picture of her granddaughter in a crowded room in the Patterson Park Library in Baltimore City. As she held up the photo of a young smiling girl she stated, “I am here because of her — this is her century and we must protect the Earth for her.” Cheryl was one of 21 people who testified in front of the Maryland Climate Commission.
The Maryland Climate Commission — a stakeholder group of government, industry, and nonprofits including Chesapeake Climate Action Network — are working to get public input on Maryland’s Climate Action Plan.
The Baltimore City meeting which took place on Tuesday, July 14th  was the first in a series of public forums to be held on climate change. More than twenty activists and concerned citizens said they want to see more aggressive action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase usage of clean, efficient energy in Maryland.
On November 15th, the commission will release a report to the General Assembly with recommendations about next steps for climate action in Maryland, and the purpose of these listening sessions is to help inform that report.
CCAN and our allies have been encouraging activists to attend these sessions, and this kickoff event was a great success! Leaders from the faith community, environmental groups, labor organizations, low-income advocates, and several concerned citizens packed the room and delivered a clear message to the commission. They said they want the state to stay on course to achieve the science-based carbon cuts required by the Maryland Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act of 2009. That law needs to be renewed in 2016 by the General Assembly. Many of those present said lawmakers should not only renew but also strengthen the landmark law.
Several activists also referred to the state’s clean electricity standard (the Renewable Portfolio Standard or RPS), saying it should be increased to at least a 25% by 2020 standard. With the RPS too, many activists urged the commission to consider going even beyond 25% by 2020. Many activists also addressed the importance of statewide energy efficiency measures, again encouraging decision makers to strengthen existing goals.
There are several other Commission hearings planned across the state:

  • Frostburg – UMCES Appalachian Laboratory – 7/28, 6pm
  • Avenue – All Saints Episcopal Parish Hall – 8/4, 6pm
  • Largo – PG County Department of Environment Resources – 8/6, 6pm

Don’t miss out on this opportunity to raise your voice and hold our state accountable to strong climate action at the next listening session!