Bristol Herald editorializes AGAINST Wise County Coal Plant

Two weeks ago, the US Forest Service wrote the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality concerned that the proposed Wise County Power Plant would pollute a national park in North Carolina. Citizens spoke out against the proposed plant at a hearing last week. Charlottesville, Blacksburg, and Arlington have all passed resolutions against the proposed plant.But NONE of those come close to today’s development. The Bristol Herald (which last week endorsed Senator William Wampler) just editorialized AGAINST the Wise County Power Plant. Check it out!

BY Bristol Herald Courier Editorial Board

Dominion Power plant is no bargain for the region

Tuesday, Dec 18, 2007

All along, Dominion Power Co. has touted its planned coal-burning plant in Wise County as a boon to the region.The plant, we were told, will create as many as 800 construction and coal mining jobs, along with jobs running the plant, and inject wealth into an economically depressed area. It will supply much-needed energy to fellow Virginians. It will exclusively burn Virginia coal.Sounded good until we read the fine print. Many of the jobs are temporary and the number has decreased over time. The plant, while cleaner than older coal-fired facilities, isn’t clean enough. It is still a polluter. Continue reading

Another coal plant bites the dust

Washington recommends “clean coal” plant be rejected

LOS ANGELES, Nov 27 (Reuters) – A Washington state regulatory board on Tuesday advised the governor to reject plans for Energy Northwest’s proposed 680-megawatt integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power plant because plans do not specify how carbon dioxide emissions would be sequestered underground.

The Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) said in a ruling signed Tuesday that it would reconsider the plant if Energy Northwest submits a workable plan to pump greenhouse gases — primarily CO2 — underground.

An Energy Northwest spokesman said on Tuesday that the consortium of 20 member utilities and cities has yet to decide what to do next regarding the proposed Pacific Mountain Energy Center, which has a price tag of at least $1.5 billion.

That $1.5 billion sounds a lot like what Dominion is projecting their new plant will cost… Continue reading

Picking up steam – coal fight goes national

The debate over coal has caught on all across the U.S., even reaching into the heartland, and America is beginning to stand up and demand clean energy.

Clean Energy for VA

The Des Moines Register’s Perry Beeman lays it out in an informative piece centered on controversies in Iowa, a state that’s also front and center now in the presidential race.

Environmentalists, NASA’s chief climate scientist, industry experts and citizens are lining up to testify about the coal-burning plants, which could affect Iowans’ lungs, power bills, fish-eating habits and ability to find jobs. The debate over whether to build the two Iowa plants is part of a national argument as utilities and a new breed of so-called “merchant generators” have plans for 150 new coal-fired plants. States as different as Kansas, California, Idaho and Florida have blocked new coal-fired plants. Even Texas forced its biggest utility to pare down a proposal for 11 new coal plants to three.

NASA’s chief climate scientist, James Hansen is an Iowa native and graduate of University of Iowa. He is also an outspoken critic of coal, saying “It seems to me that young people, especially, should be doing whatever is necessary to block construction of dirty coal-fired power plants” back in August. He’s provided testimony against the proposed Iowa plants. Continue reading

Putting Coal on the Ballot in Virginia

My alarm went off at 6:00 am. The rain was falling outside and I could count on hours of sleep on one hand (and no thumb). The urge to hit snooze was overwhelming, but I had a job to do! It was November 6th, election day, and I had to get COAL on the ballot!

I was one of over a hundred volunteers participating on “Vote No on Coal”, an outreach campaign designed to educate people about the proposed coal-fired power plant Dominion Virginia Power wants to build in Wise County, and why we as citizens need to say NO NEW COAL. This plant will cost $1.6 billion in taxpayer money, emit millions of tons of CO2, and bring further environmental and health hazards to the already impacted communities of SW Virginia.

Our goal was to collect signatures for a “mile-long petition” that Kathy Selvage and other members of Wise-County based Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards will present to Dominion at their annual shareholder meeting.

Continue reading

Coal Kaput in Kansas – what does this mean for Wise County?

Great news for the climate. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment yesterday became the first government agency in the United States to cite carbon dioxide emissions as the reason for rejecting an air permit for a proposed coal-fired electricity generating plant, saying that the greenhouse gas threatens public health and the environment. Read the Washington Post story here.

Kansas has stepped up to help lead the nation away from the dirty energy technologies and towards smart energy solutions. Virginia should follow Kansas’ lead and do its part to help fight global warming by finding cleaner, better ways to produce energy, a goal that does not include allowing Dominion Virginia Power build their proposed coal-fired power plant in Wise County. As most of you probably know, CCAN is part of a major effort to stop Dominion’s proposed power plant.

Kansas’s Sunflower Electric Power, a rural electrical cooperative, wanted to build the pair of big, 700-megawatt, coal-fired plants in order to supply power to parts of Kansas and fast-growing eastern Colorado. Similarly, Dominion claims they need to build the Wise County power plant to meet the growing demand for electricity in Virginia, especially as the population in Northern Virginia explodes.

One interesting note is that Kansas, like Virginia, is not exactly committed to the idea of conserving energy. In fact Kansas and Virginia are in a three-way tie (along with Wyoming) for last in the nation in spending on demand-side management programs according to the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. Those three are the only states that spent absolutely nothing on demand-side conservation.

Despite their lack of interest in energy efficiency and conservation programs in the past, Kansas yesterday reversed course and put climate and health concerns first. Instead of a new coal plant, Kansas has committed to taking a path to a clean energy future.

Dominion has been using the threat of rolling blackouts for a while now. Yet Dominion’s threats are unfounded. Virginia can do better — much better – on energy efficiency and renewable energy, making a new coal plant unnecessary.

CCAN and its coalition members — the Sierra Club, Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards, Appalachian Voices, and the Southern Environmental Law Center — are fighting Dominion’s proposed coal plant in the courtroom, at the statehouse, and on the street. The victory in Kansas gives us something to point to to show that wise energy decisions are being made in the U.S. right now!

Continue reading

Why I Fight Coal

One would hope that we, as a society, are closing in on a conscious recognition that the time to remove coal from the ground to burn it is nearly done.

rebuttal to liquefied coal article

Lowell Miller’s column arguing in support of liquefied coal as an energy source was disturbing and irresponsible.

Mr. Miller claimed that carbon sequestration has rendered concerns over liquid
coal’s pollution obsolete. That is simply untrue. Carbon sequestration is not reliable technology on a commercial scale.

Some climate experts say we have ten years to stabilize, then reduce, greenhouse gas emissions in order to avoid the worst consequences of global
warming. Subsidizing coal to liquid technology would be a giant step in the wrong direction.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, every gallon of liquid coal burned would generate twice the carbon emissions generated by a gallon of gasoline derived from petroleum.
If we want our children to have a chance at inheriting a planet without melted polar ice caps, coastal flooding, unpredictable weather patterns and
the chaos and poverty this entails, we must vote now for energy policies that strive for energy independence created by clean, alternative energy technologies such as wind, solar and bio-diesel power.

A future based on clean energy independence means a future of better global health and security. I am proud of leaders like Gov. Martin O’Malley, who has recently formed a commission to reduce Maryland greenhouse gas pollution 15 percent per capita by 2015 .
This necessary goal is achievable if we are willing to make voluntary changes to reduce our carbon footprint and demand legislative changes that move us toward an energy policy based on clean, renewable energy.

Katherine Hinckley
Towson

Putting Coal in Perspective

This was just passed onto to me from a friend and fellow climate activist. While some might find the piece a bit cynical, I think it affirms the need for a coal moratorium. Luckily, we just might have a little help.

Protect Your Efforts

Just when we thought we were making a difference…

Home Depot has funded the planting of 300,000 trees in cities across the US. Each tree will absorb and store about one-third of a ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) over its lifetime. In addition to the coal plants that already exist, there are now 151 new conventional coal-fired power plants in various stages of development in the US today. The CO2 emissions from only one medium-sized (500 MW) coal-fired power plant, in just 10 days of operation, would negate the Home Depot’s entire effort.

Wal-Mart, the largest “private” purchaser of electricity in the world is investing a half billion dollars to reduce the energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of their existing buildings by 20% over the next 7 years. “As one of the largest companies in the world, with an expanding global presence, environmental problems are our problems,” said CEO Lee Scott. The CO2 emissions from only one medium-sized coal-fired power plant, in just one month of operation each year, would negate Wal-Mart’s entire effort.

California, which makes up over 10% of the country’s new vehicle market, passed legislation to cut GHG emissions in new cars by 25% and in SUVs by 18%, starting in 2009. If every car and SUV sold in California in 2009 met this standard, the CO2 emissions from only one medium-sized coal-fired power plant, in just eight months of operation each year, would negate California’s 2009 effort.

In the US, approximately 5 billion square feet of residential, commercial and government buildings are renovated in a year. The US Conference of Mayors, American Institute of Architects, US Green Building Council and numerous states, counties and cities have adopted The 2030 Challenge to reduce the energy consumption of all renovated buildings by 50%. The CO2 emissions from just one 750 MW coal-fired power plant each year would negate this entire 2030 Challenge effort.

If every household in the U.S. changed a 60-watt incandescent light bulb to a compact fluorescent, the CO2 emissions from just two medium-sized coal-fired power plants each year would negate this entire effort.

The Campus Climate Challenge (CCC), a growing student movement in the US, states that global warming “is our problem, and it’s up to us to solve it, starting right here on campus, right now.” The challenge calls for all high school and college campuses in the US to go carbon neutral (reduce global warming pollution to zero). If the challenge were met, the CO2 emissions from just four medium-sized coal-fired power plants each year would negate the CCC’s entire effort.

Continue reading