Life's a beach.

This morning, CCAN staff, volunteers and concerned Americans nationwide staged series of beach-themed rallies in around fifty cities across the country. Held in partnership with 1Sky, the festive gathering sought to urge our Senators to enact climate legislation that ensures a real cap on CO2, dictated by the EPA, as well as creating strong provisions for domestic renewable and clean energy development here at home.

We arrived in force at Senator Jim Webb’s office (VA) at around noon, sporting swim trunks, floral leis, and signs reading, “Don’t send clean energy out with the tide!” and “Clean energy jobs NOW!” as Richmonders downtown looked on during the lunchtime break. While volunteers passed the time, playing a makeshift game of beach volleyball, spirits were high and good times were certainly had. Glen, the inflatable dolphin, also made an appearance.

This is not to say, however, that today’s participants were ignorant of the severe implications of a world climate crisis. Despite the relaxed attire and positive attitudes, all involved exuded deep concern and real frustration at the marginal progress that Congress has made so far in taking a strong approach to fixing the potentially fatal issue of global climate change.

The American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACESA), in its current form, sucks. We have charged the United States Senate with rectifying the mistakes of its counterpart, the House of Representatives, in transforming this confusing and weak legislation into something that us as climate activists may be proud of. A weak renewable energy standard, coupled with an abysmal form of cap-and-trade that allows for the largest polluters to incur the smallest costs, has shown that politics as usual continues to dilute the debate over how we must transition as a nation into a cleaner, more efficient economy.

Virginia, as always, finds itself in an election year, spearheaded by two candidates whose environmental stances still leave a lot to be desired. Without significant action by our representatives in Washington, the Commonwealth will see little incentive to transform the way that we currently generate and consume our energy in Virginia. If the Senate falters on this legislation, our hopes for rapid progress will become quickly diminished.

We have not yet a reason, however, to lose hope. Senator Webb has repeatedly expressed his dissatisfaction with the current state of ACESA, and as its Senatorial counterpart, ACELA, progresses through its infancy in committee, we can hope that he and Senator Warner will encourage significant improvements, including restoring the full oversight of the EPA in regulating carbon emissions, increasing requirements for the renewable portfolio standard, and placing a real cap on dirty fossil fuel and coal industries, who hold too great a sway in national and Virginia politics.

Webb, a veteran and military buff, understands the real dangers to national security posed by climate change, with sea-level rise playing a major role in Virginia’s potential future. With the world’s largest naval base in Norfolk, Virginia, the threat of rising tides will play a major role in Mr. Webb’s future decisions regarding climate change and its impacts.

So, the beach theme found itself to be eerily appropriate. There may be, after all, a day when any average Richmond citizen will need only to walk a few short blocks before breaking out the surfboard. Let’s hope not.

New Marching Orders from Senator Cardin: Get More Letters!

To paraphrase a great speechifier: If there is anyone out there who still doubts whether a little teamwork makes all things possible; who still wonders if our collective democratic actions truly influence our elected officials; who still questions the power of grassroots climate activism, today’s letter drop to Ben Cardin was your answer.

Today we dropped by Capitol Hill for our second big delivery of letters to Senator Cardin. Our first delivery of 250 handwritten letters a few weeks back clearly earned us the Senator’s respect, because today the Senator dispatched none other than his top legislative adviser, Michael Burke to receive our latest batch of 260 letters. Letter team leaders Ellen McGovern (Silver Spring), Susan Stewart (Greenbelt) and Sunita Pathik (Burtonsville) headed up the delivery ceremony as immortalized in the picture below.

Mission accomplished; a job well done. But the best moment was yet to come. Continue reading

How to Get a Strong Senate Climate Bill, Part 4: Party!

The passage of the Waxman-Markey bill in June may not be reason to celebrate but it is certainly reason to party. That’s because we’re going to have to fight hard to get a strong bill from the Senate in the coming months and partying is actually one of the best ways to prepare ourselves for that fight.

With everything we’re up against including a coal lobby that forges letters to our congressional leaders, we need to do everything we can this August to strengthen our movement for the fight ahead. That means taking actions like our campaign to collect 1000 handwritten letters to Cardin, but it also means building our community, connecting with one another, having fun.

In other words, we need to have some parties. Climate community mixers are just as critical to growing our movement as the actions we take, and as with our actions, the success of our parties depends upon you.

Please volunteer today to host a climate house party this month. Hosting is really simple; all you need to contribute is a space for a few dozen local climate activists to meet, mingle and have fun. CCAN will help you work out the details, spread the word, and turn out the crowd.

Contact me (keith@chesapeakeclimate.org) today to register to host an house party. You won’t find a funner way to help our movement this summer. Once you’ve registered, I’ll give you a ring to help get the party started. Sign up now and help us make this an eventful August.

What a Strong Bill Looks Like, Part 1: Consumer Protection

Solving global warming is not going to happen over night. The lawmakers dealing with climate legislation now are probably not going to be in office in 2050, when we need to have cut our global warming pollution 80%. So a key part of any climate bill is whether it’s built to last – through Congressional terms, Presidents, and generations.

We need public support for a carbon cap for at least the next 40 years as we work our way toward 80% cuts. The best way to do that is to make sure that the Senate climate bill is fair — it has to put people before polluters.

President Obama last February laid out a framework to fight global warming that was simple, fair, and built to last. All polluters would pay for greenhouse gas emissions, the President said. No exceptions. The money gathered from polluters would then be rebated to middle- and lower-income Americans while leaving $15 billion per year for investments in clean energy and green jobs.

This framework — where 100 percent of the carbon credits are auctioned and revenues used for direct consumer relief — protects consumers and ensures that polluters aren’t given a free ride.

Unfortunately, the House-passed clean energy bill was heavy on the corporate giveaways and light on the protections for energy consumers. The House version would give away 85 percent of the carbon credits for free to utilities, oil refiners and manufacturers. While consumers are offered no protection from price volatility or rate hikes in this version, industrial energy users secured protections to guarantee their bottom lines.

That’s why a coalition of heavy-hitting groups including AARP, Public Citizen, the Consumer Federation of America, and the National Consumer Law Center have teamed up with CCAN to call on the Senate to establish a stronger system of consumer protection. Continue reading

Climate Carrots for China and India

Amidst high theatrics, the Senate wrapped up its climate policy hearings last week, shifting the issue to the back-burner until after the August recess. Meanwhile the climate action spotlight followed US Secretary of Energy Stephen Chu and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton overseas as they brought the Obama climate lobby to China and India respectively. carrot

By now, the story of China and India is a familiar one: both countries are quickly growing into carbon spewing behemoths. Both claim climate action could hurt their economies. Neither is enthusiastic about committing to legally binding emissions cuts. Either could emerge as a spoiler in climate treaty talks in Copenhagen this December.

To its credit the Obama administration has been making some efforts to change all that recently. Hence we’ve seen the high level Chu and Clinton missions and Obama’s joint resolution with other G8 leaders on endeavoring to limit global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius, and cut emissions 80% by 2050. Trying to set a good example, the US is finally starting to talk the talk on global climate action.

But so far all this has really amounted to is a lot of talk, with no legally binding action to back it up, and promises are clearly not the kind of climate carrots that China and India will respond to. Despite diplomatic overtures by the US, neither country has signed onto the emissions reductions goals set at the G8 summit, and neither Clinton or Chu ended their climate missions with very much to show except more Chinese and Indian refusals to talk about legally binding emissions targets.

Even the Waxman-Markey bill didn’t do much to impress either country. In fact, their only real reaction to the passage of the bill was outrage at the last minute amendment imposing “carbon tariffs” on goods imported from countries without climate laws in place.

The upshot here is essentially what we in the climate movement have been saying about US leadership and the international picture all along. If we want the Chinas and Indias of the world to come on board, we have to lead by example and pass a strong climate bill that codifies our commitment to seriously addressing our own contribution to the crisis.

And this is not just a matter of inspiration. Many of the provisions that climate advocates have been calling for to make the bill effective domestically, are also exactly the kind of carrots that may enhance the international impact of the bill and produce results if dangled before countries like China and India. A bill which strictly limits allowance giveaways to polluters, for example, will produce more revenue for domestic investments in energy efficiency, green jobs and consumer protection programs, as well as international investments in the types of clean energy technology transfer programs China and India have been calling for.

All the more reason for the Senate to deliver on a strong bill this fall, and for President Obama to invest just as much high profile lobbying time on swing Senators at home as swing States abroad. For if the best approach to climate leadership abroad is through climate leadership at home, then Obama’s best international lobby strategy must rest on a strong Senate lobby strategy.

Navigating a Minefield Part 2

Cross-posted from: here

In my first post on the coming climate legislation battle in the Senate, I focused on a myriad of suggestions on how both the politicians pushing legislation as well as environmental activists and organizations could work to get a stronger bill. Despite the monumental challenge of getting to 60 votes in the Senate, as I said in the first post which I won’t repeat in depth here, there are advantages in terms of how to increase the pressure on Senators that we didn’t have in the House. However that isn’t the focus of this post. This post basically shows that absent a much stronger and smarter mobilization in the Senate, there will need to be wheeling and dealing done by President Obama, Barbara Boxer and Harry Reid, along with top Democrats.

As a disclaimer I will say that the “pick your poison” scenario I lay out at the end is not one that I would like to see. It is simply a look at what it’s going to take to get 60. Another disclaimer is this is a long post, so bring a snack. Continue reading

Strong Men Take Over Senate Hearing

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson testified before the Environment and Public Works Committee Tuesday as the Senate drafts its version of a clean energy and climate bill. Grassroots advocates with CCAN and the Avaaz Climate Action Factory, some wearing strong man suits, turned out in force to demand a stronger bill. In honor of Administrator Jackson’s presence, we specifically demanded restoration of the EPA’s authority to regulate global warming pollution from coal plants.

As you know, the House of Representatives successfully passed H.R. 2454, a 1,400-page cap-and-trade bill that was the result of months of negotiations. The bill underwent many changes as its authors – Congressmen Markey and Waxman — negotiated to get the votes they calculated it needed to pass. The result? The House-passed bill just isnt’ good enough.

In one of the most controversial compromises, the House repealed the Clean Air Act provision that empowered the EPA to regulate carbon pollution from dirty coal plants.

Without this provision, the Obama Administration is powerless to stop hundreds of old, dirty coal plants from spewing global warming pollution into the air. Some of the biggest climate polluters on the planet could be let off the hook.

Even worse, the coal industry is trying to build at least 100 more dirty coal plants. For years, environmental and citizen groups have blocked these plants. Right now the Chesapeake Climate Action Network is fighting two proposed coal plants in Virginia alone. If this Clean Air Act provision is eliminated, local groups may be unable to stop another generation of dependence on dirty coal.

Tuesday marked the beginning of a series of hearings and high-level meetings aimed at producing a Senate complement to the House climate bill. CCAN and others will be working non stop to make sure the Senate bill truly delivers on the clean energy future we so desperately need. Want to stay in the loop? Join our special “Hill Force” list and we’ll keep you up to date on how to get involved.

Calling all Climate Superheroes

In the recent House climate vote, the Maryland Congressional delegation broke largely in favor of protecting our climate. Seven out of eight of our Congressional representatives or about 90 percent of the delegation stood up for climate and clean energy action by voting yes on the American Clean Energy and Security Act. That statistic puts Maryland among the top ten states in terms of percentage of the state Congressional delegation that voted yes on the bill.

Besides begging the question why peak-oil-Cassandra Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD-06) decided to vote against the best chance our country has had in years to break our dependence on oil, this vote stands as a testament to the Maryland Congressional delegation’s appreciation of the severity of the threat that climate change poses to Maryland.

Marylanders should count themselves lucky to have leaders that are so plugged in. As we at CCAN are always quick to point out, Maryland is the third most vulnerable state in the country to sea level rise, and few states are more in need of federal leaders who understand the need for federal climate action.

This fact is underscored by a recent study which shows that the forecast for climate impacts on Maryland is direr than previously predicted.

According to the EPA study, Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region, there is growing evidence that sea level rise in Mid Atlantic states like Maryland is accelerating, and that the combination of rising seas and stronger storms could result in unforeseen tipping points for vulnerable wetlands and islands.

Preventing this dire forecast from unfolding will require bold action from the federal government, so it’s heartening that our leaders are acting in their constituents’ best interests. However, as I wrote in a post last week, and Mike Tidwell emphasized in a recent letter, while the ACES bill is a baby step in the right direction, the solutions it offers fall far short of what is truly required to slow climate change and protect the Bay.

We need a stronger bill from the Senate, and that means we need our Maryland Senators to not just match but better the level of leadership exhibited by Maryland’s Congressional delegation. The time for climate heroes has passed; now’s the time for climate superheroes. Of course our elected officials’ legislative muscle is only ever as strong as our voices. So get on the phone to Senators Mikulski and Cardin today to help pump them up!

ACES Ambivalence Disorder

ACES-Ambivalence

So the US House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act on Friday. Given that many of us in the climate community have been griping for months on end about what a compromised, watered down, insufficient, coal friendly, piece of corporate welfare that the bill is, many of you may be wondering how you’re supposed to feel about this. Should we jeer or cheer? Should we do like Al and celebrate the mere passage of a climate bill as an historic achievement, or make like Greenpeace and raise our fists in protest against this flawed product of a hobbled political system?

If you’re ambivalent, that’s okay. Torn is exactly how you should feel about this bill. You’re just experiencing a very common condition I like to call ACES Ambivalence Disorder (AAD). Symptoms include irritability, frustration, dissatisfaction, anger, resentment, and political disillusionment on the one hand, and on the other a vague sense of hope and relief that the government is finally, actually, incredibly doing something (and may do more if only we push them).

If you peruse the array of statements many environmental orgs and yea-voting reps released after the ACES vote, you’ll find that most of the authors have been stricken with AAD as well. Just consider this press release from 1Sky, entitled “1Sky is Relieved by House Victory on Energy Bill; Ready to Work for More.” We feel you 1Sky. Or, kind of. I think.

We at CCAN are not entirely immune either. On Friday after scrambling (successfully!) to get MD Congressmen like Frank Kratovil just to vote yes on ACES, I joined Mike Tidwell, Jesse Tolkan and over a hundred climate activists on the east lawn of the Capitol to demand that Congress give us more.

So, again, to all you suffering from AAD, fear not. It’s perfectly normal. You’re in perfectly good company.

And best of all, there’s a cure. And you can be part of it. Here’s how: finish reading this blog, go directly to your phone and call Senators Cardin and Mikulski to let them know how you feel. Tell them that for starters what we need to help us all feel better about the bill and alleviate our AAD is the restoration of the EPA’s authority to regulate emissions from coal-fired power plants, and a huge dose of their leadership. For the full prescription check out Mike Tidwell’s recent letter.

Here’s to our speedy convalescence. Continue reading

Sign Up

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Help promote policies that keep fossil fuels in the ground and advance clean energy in Maryland, D.C., Virginia, and nationwide. Give Now

Copyright © 2025 Chesapeake Climate Action Network.     Terms of Use.     Privacy Policy. 

Charity Navigator-Four-Star Rating Badge
Guidestar

CCAN is the sister organization of CCAN Action Fund:

CCAN Action Fund
Photo from Roll Call