The city of Baltimore at risk. This map, produced by Forest Ethics, shows the evacuation zone (red) for oil train derailments and the potential impact zone (yellow) in case of an oil train fire. Find out more at:
The city of Baltimore at risk. This map, produced by Forest Ethics, shows the evacuation zone (red) for oil train derailments and the potential impact zone (yellow) in case of an oil train fire. Find out more at:

Big Oil companies’ push to extract and refine more extreme forms of oil has led to a surge of trains carrying toxic, explosive, and climate-polluting oil on our nation’s rail lines. Oil train traffic grew 5,100 percent from 2008 to 2014 due to the rapid increase in fracking for oil in the Bakken shale fields of North Dakota and in tar sands oil extraction in Canada. By September 2015, U.S. crude oil production had surged to an average of 9.4 million barrels per day. An alarming rate of derailments and explosions across North America has followed.

In Maryland, oil trains are a danger to communities near rail lines and to Baltimore in particular. The oil industry is targeting Baltimore — with its large and centrally located port — as a gateway to ship crude oil to East Coast refineries. And since the crude export ban was lifted in December of 2015, the oil industry has been given a green light to ship crude oil worldwide. Oil exports nationally have skyrocketed, increasing 1,000 percent from 2009 through the end of 2016.

To protect our communities and climate, CCAN is fighting to put the brakes on Big Oil’s plans to use Baltimore as a gateway for extreme crude oil.

Oil Trains in Baltimore: Putting 165,000 residents at risk

The East Coast has become a primary region receiving crude oil by rail from both North Dakota and Canada and is the destination of roughly 50 percent of all crude-by- rail traffic by volume. An average of 450,000 barrels per day was delivered by rail to the East Coast in 2014.

Rail companies have fought to keep oil train routes secret in Maryland, and sued the state to prevent their public disclosure.

However, we know these trains are already rolling through Baltimore in large numbers. A company called Axeon shipped more than 100 million gallons of crude oil out of the Fairfield Peninsula in South Baltimore over the years 2013 and 2014 (up from zero gallons the previous two years). Substantially more crude oil passes through Maryland communities, but that data is not captured by regulators unless the oil is unloaded.

According to a analysis of known rail routes, oil trains travel in close proximity to Baltimore homes, schools, churches, and major economic hubs like the Inner Harbor. When overlaid with U.S. Census data, that puts 165,000 Baltimore residents in the oil train “blast zone” — the area that would be directly impacted if a train were to derail and explode.

Explosive Oil: Too Dangerous for the Rails

Explosive Trains. This photo shows the aftermath of a DOT-111 train derailment and subsequent explosion that brought crude oil into Lac-Mégantic, Québec. The explosion killed 47.
Explosive Trains. This photo shows the aftermath of a DOT-111 train derailment and subsequent explosion that brought crude oil into Lac-Mégantic, Québec. The explosion killed 47.

The Bakken crude oil that the fossil fuel industry is moving on trains is more toxic and explosive than conventional oil. It contains a higher concentration of flammable methane and toxic fracking chemicals.

Not only are the contents extremely hazardous, but the trains themselves are outdated and dangerous. A study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that crude oil trains have a high incidence of failure. The oldest model trains, labeled “DOT-111,” have derailed repeatedly around the country and are nicknamed “Pepsi cans on wheels.” But newer “CPC-1232” train car models have also exploded in recent derailments, proving that there is no safe way to transport crude oil by rail.

When accidents happen, the human and environmental impacts are costly. The deadliest oil train explosion occurred in July 2013 in Lac-Mégantic, Québec. Twenty crude oil trains derailed and exploded, killing 47 people and flattening 30 buildings. In April 2014, 10 newer tank cars carrying crude oil derailed and exploded in Lynchburg, VA, spilling about 30,000 gallons of Bakken crude oil and setting the James River on fire for two hours. Between February 2015 and June 2016, nine trains carrying crude oil derailed and caused fires, explosions, and evacuations across the country.

In May 2015, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued new rules intended to improve the safety of oil trains. However, the rules include loopholes and weak standards that would allow hazardous trains on the rails for years to come, and the Trump administration could easily undo even these weak regulations.

Air Pollution: Disproportionate Impacts to South Baltimore

The South Baltimore area that oil companies want to use as a gateway for processing and shipping crude oil already bears a disproportionate burden of toxic industrial pollution compared to the rest of Maryland. In 2016, ATTOM Data Solutions found the Curtis Bay zip code to have the third highest Total Environmental Hazard Index value in the country.

Climate Change: Deepening Dependence on Harmful Fossil Fuels

The tremendous growth of Bakken shale oil production in North Dakota has also led to a rapid rise in the production of associated natural gas, which is often “flared off” on-site – so much so that it can be seen from space. Flaring at the Bakken shale emits roughly 6.7 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year, which is the greenhouse gas pollution equivalent of adding about 1.4 million cars onto the road each year.

Fracking wells leak gases into groundwater and into the air. One of the gases, methane, is approximately 86 times as potent a greenhouse gas pollutant as carbon dioxide over a 20-year timeframe. The combination of flaring and methane leakage during Bakken oil extraction contributes to cumulative heat-trapping emissions that are potentially much higher than other sources of oil.

Community Organizing: Beating Back Big Oil’s Plans 


Mayors, first responders, neighborhood associations, and citizens are coming together all over the country to take a stand against oil trains and crude oil export terminals — including right here in Baltimore.

In 2014, Texas-based Targa Terminals applied for a permit to establish a new crude oil shipping terminal in South Baltimore that would have sent millions of gallons of crude oil through the Chesapeake Bay to East Coast refineries. But Marylanders fought back and forced regulators to hit the pause button on Targa’s plans in June 2015

Due to this public pressure, Targa officially withdrew its permit application in July 2016. This victory will protect Baltimore residents from an additional 380 million gallons of dangerous crude oil being shipped through the city on railways per year.

Thanks to your help, we’ve prevented an immediate increase in oil trains moving through Baltimore neighborhoods — for now. But stronger city, state, and federal action is urgently needed to protect our health, safety and climate.

Take Action!

Leaders at all levels can protect communities from dangerous oil trains:

BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL: In January 2016, Baltimore City Council President Jack Young introduced an ordinance to study the health and safety risks associated with oil trains and crude oil shipping within Baltimore. The City Council failed to vote on this measure before the 2016 term ended in December, despite more than 2,000 petitions and public comments from city residents urging action. As activists work with City Council members to introduce a new piece of legislation in 2017, we need to keep up the pressure!

Take Action: Urge the Baltimore City Council to act on the risks of oil trains.

STATE LEGISLATORS: Our state legislators should support legislation during the next General Assembly session to require rail companies to disclose the route, frequency and volume of crude oil being transported by rail.

FEDERAL LEADERS: Our federal leaders can enact an immediate ban on oil trains, because there is NO safe way to transport crude oil. At a minimum, the Department of Transportation can take the oldest and most dangerous cars, including DOT-111s, off the rails.

To get involved with the campaign, contact: Taylor Smith-Hams, our Maryland Healthy Communities Organizer, at


CCAN/Clean Water Action Fact Sheet: A Just Transition for Baltimore: From Pollution and Dangerous Fossil Fuels to Clean Energy and Good Jobs 6/2017

CCAN Fact Sheet: Oil Trains in Baltimore: Too Dangerous for the Rails 6/2017

Baltimore Sun LTE: Is Baltimore safe from rail accidents? 4/2017

Maryland Environmental Health Network Fact Sheet: Public Health and Safety Risks of Crude-by-Rail

Press Release: Company Withdraws Plans for Crude Oil Terminal in Baltimore

Ordinance 16-0621: View the text of the ordinance before the Baltimore City Council.

CCAN Fact Sheet — MD HB 1434 – Rail Safety Act of 2016

Baltimore Sun: Crude oil continues to flow through Maryland amid debate about safety

Baltimore Sun: 2 railroads sue Md. to prevent disclosure of crude oil shipments.

ForestEthics: Oil Train Blast Zone interactive map.

Oil Change International Report: “Runaway Train: The Reckless Expansion of Crude by Rail in America.”

Richmond Times-DispatchNTSB investigating derailment, oil spill in Lynchburg.