Why We Oppose the Proposed Exelon-Pepco Merger

In April, the giant utility company Exelon announced plans to buy Pepco, the electricity utility that serves customers in Maryland and Washington, D.C. Exelon would become the biggest power distributor in Maryland and in the United States — should the deal go through. But for that to happen, the Public Service Commissions in the District of Columbia and Maryland must approve it, and find that the deal serves the “public interest.”
As an environmental group, we are strongly opposed to the proposed merger between Exelon and Pepco. In Maryland, we know this project is certainly not in the public interest.  Not only would it give Exelon a near-monopoly over our state’s utility market, but also it would severely restrict Maryland’s ability to transition to the clean, affordable, and efficient electricity grid we need. Furthermore, given Exelon’s track record, which includes opposition to many renewable energy policies, we are concerned that there is no way forward for this merger that would produce the key reforms and positive elements that Maryland’s electricity grid requires.
Today, CCAN joined together with twenty consumer, student, environmental, business and faith groups to announce our staunch and united opposition to this merger. The Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) must sign off on the merger before it can proceed, and we are standing together to say: Stop the Merger! No Exelon Monopoly in Maryland.
Sign-on letter opposing the merger:
Click here to view a PDF copy of the open letter signed by 20 groups opposing the Merger.
Press release:
Click here to view our press Release-Maryland Leaders Oppose Exelon-Pepco Merger.
Resources:
Delaware Panel Sets Hearings on Exelon, Pepco Merger.” Delaware News Journal. 7/10/2014.
Exelon and Pepco File for Merger in Maryland.” Exelon. 8/19/2014.
Exelon merger in New Jersey blocked.” State of New Jersey.” 4/26/2006.
Exelon Tops Maryland Lobbying Spending. RTO Insider.” 7/2/2014.
Utility Exelon Trying to Kill Wind and Solar Subsidies While Keeping Nukes.” Greentech Media. 4/1/2014.
Why DC Should Oppose the Exelon-Pepco Merger.” Washington Post. 8/1/2014.

Cove Point: Feds give flawed approval. We keep fighting.

On Monday, at 7:40 p.m., the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced its final order approving this radical, fracked-gas export facility proposed along the Chesapeake Bay in southern Maryland.
Despite mounds of testimony and scientific data showing this $3.8 billion facility would incentivize harmful fracking throughout our region and bring unconscionable safety risks to nearby communities, FERC refused to even conduct an environmental impact statement for the project. Despite a study from the U.S. Department of Energy showing that gas exports are likely worse than coal for global warming over the next 20 years, FERC didn’t even try to quantify the project’s climate impacts before lending its rubber stamp.
In other words, the FERC decision on Cove Point is a giant lie — and we will challenge it. In the same way that TransCanada lies about the harms of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, FERC lies about Cove Point. In the same way that Peabody Coal lies about the harms of mountaintop removal mining, FERC lies about Cove Point. The secretive, truth-hiding collaboration between FERC and its gas-industry partner Dominion Resources (the energy bully and would-be builder of Cove Point), is an affront to every child, parent, and grandparent on this planet.
Which is why we are NOT going to stop fighting against Cove Point — from the streets to the courts. We’re just moving to the legal phase now. And we’ll move to the next phase and the next after that. And how could we stop fighting anyway?
There were 400,000 people in New York City just ten days ago, with a roar and a mass so big I’m sure satellites picked it up in outer space. The People’s Climate March, with babies wearing windmill crowns and senior citizens wearing “Stop Fracking” buttons, signaled that a new day is dawning in America. We’re the movement we’ve always been waiting for! We’re here. We’re big. And we’re going to win. Which means we have no time for a worse-than-coal export facility for fracked gas in Maryland. The FERC approval is a momentary setback. It’s just a prelude to the legal battle just ahead. CCAN and our partners will likely sue soon, demanding a proper and thorough environmental impact statement as our right by law.
What can you do right away to keep fighting? Here’s what:
1. Join the rapid response demonstration that CCAN and our allies are planning outside the FERC headquarters in Washington, DC this Friday.
Or, if you’re a Southern Marylander, join a solidarity demonstration Friday outside the Dominion Cove Point site in Lusby.
And if you live in Maryland:
2. Mark your calendar and join a statewide conference call on Wednesday, October 8th at 7 p.m. We’ll plot next steps on Cove Point, including how to stop all gas exports by flooding our state – and soon the planet – with solar panels and wind turbines. Join the call October 8th and learn more.
Meanwhile, at a moment like this, it’s important to thank your friends and hold your opponents accountable. The FERC decision on Monday is a setback. There’s no hiding that. It’s a massive failure of federal regulatory responsibility. And it’s a failure of political leadership. That failure starts with President Obama who, despite a world hurdling past 400 parts per million carbon in the atmosphere, has embraced a ludicrous energy policy of “all of the bove.” That explicitly includes fracking and fracked-gas exports despite the science showing such gas dooms his own children. Are the gas-industry donations to Democratic Party campaigns really worth that?
The failure continues with Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley. Despite the pleas of Calvert County Maryand residents near Cove Point, the Governor never ordered a comprehensive safety study to protect local citizens from accidental explosions at Cove Point. In fact, O’Malley literally fell asleep during a hearing on safety with citizen witnesses testifying just 30 feet across from him. Shame.
The failure continues with southern Maryland congressman Steny Hoyer and US Senators Ben Cardin and Barbara Mikulski. All three refused to publicly oppose this economically and environmentally harmful project. Indeed, none of them even called publicly for an environmental impact statement despite the pleas of voters and newspapers like The Baltimore Sun. Shame.
But as much bad behavior as there’s been in this Cove Point fight, there has been good behavior from citizen angels all across this region. Among others, many thanks to: Citizen Shale, Sierra Club, Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility, Calvert Citizens for a Healthy Community, Waterkeepers everywhere, Food and Water Watch, Maryland Environmental Health Network, Maryland League of Women Voters, 350.org, Labor Network for Sustainability, Environmental Action, Burks Gas Truth, and many, many, many more groups and individuals.
I can’t wait to work with you in the coming days and months to keep fighting for clean energy — not Dominion’s disaster at Cove Point — and to keep the spirit of the 400,000-stong New York City climate march alive and growing!
On we go,
Mike Tidwell
Director, Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Click here to read our joint press statement in response to FERC’s decision.

Sunday's Beautiful Sea of People = Power

Yesterday, we started changing everything because of everyone who showed up in the streets of New York City. The People’s Climate March was huge — with the final crowd count of 400,000 people toppling the record books and making this the biggest climate demonstration in history.
The mass numbers were apparent if, like CCAN staff and supporters, you had lined up toward the back of the 20-block-long assembly area. Standing with the Anti-Fracking Allies, who came from all over New York and Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maryland, and beyond, and just in front of the “Debate is Over” scientists’ contingent replete with a “chalkboard” lesson on climate science, we waited until well after 2:00 p.m. to start marching. In front of us and behind us was a sea of people, and a beautiful sea it was.
But it wasn’t just the numbers that were inspiring and change-making, it was who showed up to create them. They really did include just about everyone.
Indigenous communities and communities of color — who, as the banner they held stated, are on the “Frontlines of Crisis, Forefront of Change” — led the march.
PCM March Front
New Yorkers flooded out during Hurricane Sandy and other folks displaced from their homes and homelands by rising tides carried symbolic life preservers and tents.
PCM resilience Christine Irvine
A raucous, dancing and chanting youth contingent of 50,000 filled ten city blocks and united students from 400 campuses.
PCM Youth
Immigrants marched. Teamsters marched. Healthcare workers marched. So so many children marched — as well as grandparents. Muslim marchers stood shoulder to shoulder with Christians and Jews and Buddhists. LGBTQ folks like myself were part of every contingent.
In just the immediate few blocks where CCANers set off, we were surrounded by people resisting tar sands pipelines in the Midwest, oil drilling in the Arctic, fracking wells in the Catskills, and the Cove Point liquefied natural gas export terminal along the Chesapeake Bay in Southern Maryland.
PCM StopCovePoint pipelinePCM Cove Point tanker
To me, the most inspiring part of seeing so many people come together is knowing that so many people understand that we are all connected in this fight. And that is power.
Our record numbers made a bold and decisive statement about the urgency for action. And the diversity therein made a bold and decisive statement about the kind of movement we must build to win it. The solution is clear — switching from fossil fuels to clean energy. So is the biggest obstacle — an economic and political system most often run by and for big corporations, corporations that make money and maintain power by perpetuating injustice, dividing our communities and, ultimately, wrecking the planet.
Creating the change we need on climate will require transforming those systems to serve people and to protect the planet. That transformation won’t be easy, or quick, and it will take a lot more organizing on scales both bigger and smaller than the march on Sunday. But if everyone who marched on Sunday, and everyone who was there in spirit, keeps taking action — and keeps building connections between our movements — we might just have the power to build a better future for everyone.

Why I Missed the Big March This Sunday

I pulled into camp after 70 miles of riding my bike today, and the first thing I did was to call people who I knew were at the big march in New York City. It was so great to hear how big — how really big — a success this was.
It felt a little strange to be peddling my bike literally away from New York City this morning, going west into Pennsylvania from New Jersey. But that is the route of this year’s Climate Ride from New York to DC, and I am on it for the third year in a row.
I decided to honor my commitment to do this ride, and to raise the money to do it, even after I heard of the conflict between the People’s Climate March and this climate ride, and I don’t regret it. There are over 100 serious people doing this bike ride or helping to make it happen, and there is no question some of these people are in, and others will be in, the leadership of the climate movement for many years to come. It is good to be here making connections with them and telling them about the work of CCAN, along with my three other CCAN team members pictured with me above.
The climate ride also has a message to those marching today, a message just in the nature of what the ride is: 5 days riding 300 miles to support groups acting on climate and as a show of commitment to this critical civilizational struggle.
We have 185 miles to go over the next three days, arriving in a city — Washington, DC — that’s essentially in denial about the seriousness of this crisis and the need for consistent, across-the-board action to get off of fossil fuels as quickly as possible. It’s time for the people to make this happen using whatever means that we have in our nonviolent arsenal.
You can chip in to support my ride and all of the work CCAN does by clicking here.

New Report: How Will Climate-Driven Flooding Impact the Mid-Atlantic?

On September 16th, Climate Central released an updated version of its Surging Seas report, which maps out the impacts our coasts could face from storm-driven flooding as sea levels continue to rise.
The report shows that, in our region, Norfolk, Ocean City, Baltimore’s Inner Harbor, Annapolis and many communities along the Potomac are especially vulnerable.
As the Baltimore Sun reported, the Climate Central analysis estimates that sea level rise has already increased the likelihood of extreme floods by around 20 percent in areas in and around Baltimore and Annapolis. Looking ahead, more than $19.6 billion in property value in Maryland lies within five feet of the high tide line, putting it risk of storm-driven flooding under intermediate sea-level rise projections. As reported by the Washington Post, Washington, D.C. could be at risk of an 8-foot flood every ten years by 2100, when Atlantic Coast sea levels are projected to have risen by at least 2 to 4 feet. In that scenario, storm surges would put upwards of $7 billion in property at risk, including much of the National Mall and three military bases.
The report comes with an interactive map tool (see below), which you can use to see how different amounts of sea level rise and storm surges will impact coastal areas, on a neighborhood-level scale, matched with timelines of risk. This map also provides statistics of population, homes and land affected by sea level rise at the city, county and state level, plus links to fact sheets, data downloads, action plans, and more.

The same day that the Climate Central report was released, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, in conjunction with George Mason University and the Climate Communication Consortium of Maryland released a survey on Marylanders’ views of climate adaptation and sea level rise.
With the survey results, comes hope for action. Seventy-three percent of Marylanders want state and local governments to protect their communities from the impacts of climate change, and the majority said shielding coastal areas from sea-level rise should be a high or very high priority.
As lawmakers across the region debate fracking, the EPA’s proposed carbon rules, and other measures to shape our energy future, these reports should sway our decision-makers to make clean energy solutions a priority across the Mid-Atlantic. While we need to adapt to the sea level rise already locked in from the burning of fossil fuels, we also need a rapid transition to clean energy and energy efficiency technologies to prevent worst-case flooding scenarios.
Check out the reports here:
Climate Communications Consortium of Maryland: Adapting to Climate Change & Sea Level Rise
Climate Central: Surging Seas
For news coverage:
Washington Post: Flooding from storm surge would threaten D.C. infrastructure, report says
Baltimore Sun: Maryland faces worse climate-driven flooding, report warns

Everything you need to know: People's Climate March this Sunday!

Less than 100 hours remain until the People’s Climate March — the biggest climate march in history.
Here’s what you need to know to join CCAN as we make history together in New York City:
1. CCAN Meet-Up: On Sunday, September 21st, marchers will assemble on Central Park West between 65th and 86th Streets. The march will be made up of contingents coming together around shared themes. CCAN will be marching with the Anti-Fracking group, within the “We Know Who Is Responsible” bloc.
Meet up with CCANers on the corner of 81st Street and Central Park West. We’ll be with the giant Stop Cove Point Pipeline!  Sign up here to march with CCAN, and we’ll send you any last-minute updates on the meet-up location. For a map of the line-up, closest subway stops and more, check out the march logistics page here.
2. Flow of the Day: The march begins at 11:30 AM — but we suggest showing up early, especially if you want to be in one of the specific contingents. CCAN staff will be at the corner of 81st Street and Central Park West beginning at 8:00AM, so come early to hang out and check out our new CCAN t-shirts for sale. (Again, sign up here for updates). The march will end on 11th Avenue, where there will be beautiful art, music, and a closing ceremony for all who can stick around.
3. Transportation: There are over 400 buses and trains heading to the march. Click here to find one from your region. Buses will be dropping off at 86th Street and Central Park West. Please check in with your bus captain about departure times and locations.
4. Housing is still available: New Yorkers, despite their reputation, are very nice, and are opening their homes and churches to folks like you coming to town for the march. Click here to find housing for the People’s Climate March.
5. All weekend long amazing events are happening: The Youth Convergence will be a space for students to come together and share campaign knowledge. Divestment groups are meeting up to compare strategies. On Monday, thousands will “flood” Wall Street for a major sit-in. There’s a lot you won’t want to miss, so check out all the events here.

This isn’t a moment to miss: With the major United Nations climate summit following just two days after our march, every major news outlet across the world will be watching. And if we make this march bigger than any climate mobilization ever before, we, the people demanding bold action will be in every single one of those stories.
Join CCAN at the People’s Climate March. It’s going to be amazing.

Calling all Virginia students: Are YOU marching?

I’m Drew. I’m the new Virginia Campus Organizer at CCAN, and I can’t wait to dive in and support all of the amazing youth organizing happening all around our state. I spent the last few years organizing both on my campus at Virginia Tech, and bringing together students from across the region to form the Virginia Student Environmental Coalition (You can read more about me on the staff page).
I am absolutely overwhelmed at how much energy students are bringing to the People’s Climate March. Campuses across the state are mobilizing harder than I’ve ever seen, and it has me ready to work harder than ever. Already there are over 300 Virginia students planning to march this Sunday in New York City, joining more than 300 other campuses bringing thousands of students to march for our future.
The People’s Climate March is going to be the largest climate mobilization in history. With the problems we’re facing in Virginia due to dependence on fossil fuels–from severe flooding along our coast to severe asthma rates in Richmond to more severe storms just about everywhere–we need everyone there. Here are key updates on how you can: 1) Get to NYC; 2) March with the Virginia Student Environmental Coalition; and 3) Bring the momentum back to Virginia.
1) Getting there: Are you still looking for a ride? Here’s a rideboard for Virginia students to coordinate carpools to NYC. Please use it to form carpools from your area. Reminder: If you’re willing to use your car, please state how many seats you have! You can also check out the People’s Climate March ride board. Click here to see what’s available.
2) March with Virginia students: Virginia students will be marching as a block in the student delegation at the People’s Climate March. Check out the march line-up here. We will be meeting at Wagnar Cove in Central Park at 10:45 am. It’s a short walk from the 72nd Street subway station, and right in line with the student delegation. Make sure you and your delegation are there. We want to meet each other and march together to make Virginia student voices heard! For a map with the location of Sunday’s meet up point at Wagnar Cove, click here.
3) Join the call on September 24th: September 21st will be a big moment for our movement. We’re gearing up to bring that momentum back to Virginia — and keep up the pressure on our politicians and big corporate polluters like Dominion Virginia Power. To get rolling, we will be having a statewide Virginia Student Call on Wednesday, September 24th at 9pm. We will use this call to share major takeaways from the march, solidify our connections with new friends, and plan our next actions as a statewide youth network ready to combat climate change. Sign up here to join the Virginia Student Call.
The People’s Climate March is going to be big. Let’s come together and demand action on climate, both nationally and at home in Virginia.
Want to get your campus for involved in climate organizing? Email me at Drew@Chesapeakeclimate.org.

Appalachian Power Company Targets Two Solar Customers

On September 16th, Appalachian Power Company will ask the State Corporation Commission for permission to tax residential customers whose solar systems exceed 10kw in size. Some of you might be wondering how many APCo customers would be affected by the new tax. The answer? Two. That’s right, there are TWO people in APCo’s service territory who have solar systems larger than 10kw on their homes and the utility wants them to pay.
Prepare yourself as you try to follow their train of thought:
 

  • Solar customers lower their utility bills by powering their homes with the sun
  • However, these customers are still using the utility’s services when the sun isn’t shining and the solar panels aren’t generating electricity
  • The burden to provide power to these customers on a part-time basis is onerous and forces them to pass costs to other customers
  • The rest of APCo’s customers are unfairly subsidizing the “free-riders” who rely on the utility for power
  • Thus, to be fair to everyone else, APCo must tax the “free-riders” to recover the costs

To put it another way: APCo is trying to make the argument that the only two customers with significant solar installations in their Virginia service territory are increasing the utility bills of APCo’s other 447,426 Virginia residential customers so much that the utility has no choice but to slap a tax on these two moochers in order to cover the cost.
Allow me to share a few facts. APCo’s rates have more than doubled since 2005 and it has nothing to do with solar energy. In fact, solar owners actually provide a benefit to utilities by providing excess grid power during times of high demand. And speaking of benefits, the CEO of APCo’s parent company, American Electric Power, earned more than $10 million in salary and benefits in 2013. And yet, APCo is spending an untold amount of money in staff time and legal fees to petition the SCC for the right to tax their two customers who have solar panels in excess of 10kw in size.
Head-scratching for sure.
Let’s take a dive into a few details of APCo’s request.

  • The standby charges would apply to residential customers with solar installations between 10kw and 20kw in size (state law restricts residential customers from installing solar systems larger than 20kw)
  • According to the filing, APCo will ask for distribution standby charges of $1.94/kw and transmission standby charges of $1.83/kw, totaling $3.77/kw
  • Thus, homeowners with solar systems of 10kw would be taxed $37.70/mo in new standby charges, or $452.40/yr, with the potential for homeowners with the maximum-allowed 20kw solar systems of being taxed $75.40/mo or $904.80/yr

It goes without saying that taxing the sun is a silly idea. However, APCo is simply following the playbook first-written by Virginia’s utility behemoth Dominion Virginia Power. They’ve already successfully convinced the SCC to apply distribution and transmission standby charges to its customers who have similar-sized systems. Seeing this opportunity, APCo is seizing its moment to take advantage of its climate-conscious customers by imposing punishing taxes upon them.
Standby charges aren’t just a matter of economic fairness. They set a dangerous precedent that have the intention of suppressing the solar market. The state of Virginia is creating an environment that encourages the development of only the smallest of customer-owned solar systems. Homeowners who may wish to install large systems on their homes or property may think twice about crossing the 10kw threshold out of fear of being hit with taxes.
Standby charges send the wrong message during a time when the state needs to aggressively ramp up its solar energy mix. Solar prices are falling dramatically across the nation and as more citizens are educated about the benefits of solar, they are more encouraged than ever to make the switch from fossil-fuels to clean energy. Utilities everywhere are in a full-blown panic about the growth of customer-owned solar and are pulling out all the stops in order to stagnate its growth as much as possible.
The public comment deadline for APCo’s rate case is September 9th and the hearing is September 16th. Hopefully you will join CCAN in urging the SCC to not tax the sun and reject APCo’s proposed new standby charges.

Pricing Carbon, Paying Dividends Policy Update: August 2014

The Chesapeake Climate Action Network supports efforts to advance legislation to put a price on carbon and return all or most of the proceeds to American families. We are pleased to support HR 5271, the Healthy Climate and Family Security Act, “cap and dividend” legislation introduced by Congressman Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) in the House of Representatives on July 30, 2014.
We will be producing and distributing this occasional newsletter to keep others informed about developments with this bill and with other efforts to put a price on carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions.
More information on the Van Hollen bill can be found at http://climateandprosperity.org.

In This Issue:

1. A Video Message from Rep. Chris Van Hollen
2. New York Times, July 30, 2014: The Carbon Dividend, by James K. Boyce
3. The Baltimore Sun, August 4, 2014: Cap and Dividend
4. The Washington Post, August 28, 2014: A climate for change: a solution conservatives could accept
5. The Santa Fe New Mexican: A smart strategy for fighting carbon pollution
6. Bloomberg Businessweek: Is This How to Sell Americans on Fighting Global Warming?
7. CCL Legislative Update: Rep. Van Hollen introduces cap-and-dividend bill
8. With Liberty and Dividends For All book review: Use Common Wealth to Reduce Inequality

#1: A Video Message from Rep. Chris Van Hollen (2 ½ minutes)

#2: New York Times, July 30, 2014: The Carbon Dividend, by James K. Boyce

“From the scorched earth of climate debates a bold idea is rising — one that just might succeed in breaking the nation’s current political impasse on reducing carbon emissions. That’s because it would bring tangible gains for American families here and now.”
Read the New York Times op-ed.

#3: The Baltimore Sun, August 4, 2014: Cap and Dividend

“In short, the concept makes a lot of sense — in terms of promoting conservation, reducing pollution and greenhouse gases and supporting renewable energy — with the added benefit of making such a transition a bit easier for anyone with a valid Social Security number. It is the ultimate consumer-friendly approach to a rational U.S. energy policy with the chief shortcoming being that it doesn’t serve the agenda of any deep-pocketed special interest group and so may have trouble finding broad support in Congress.”
Read the Baltimore Sun editorial.

#4: The Washington Post, August 28, 2014: A climate for change: a solution conservatives could accept

“This is not the first time that Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), a House Democratic leader, has made the point that the best climate-change policy is not complicated. He introduced a similar plan in 2009. The underlying logic is older still: Since the beginning of the climate debate, mainstream economists, left and right, have argued that the best way to cut greenhouse gases is to use simple market economics, putting a price on emissions that reflects the environmental damage they cause.”
Read the Washington Post editorial.

#5: The Santa Fe New Mexican: A smart strategy for fighting carbon pollution

“I’m a University of New Mexico student who works full time to make ends meet. I support this bill because I think we need to make the price of carbon-polluting energy sources reflect their true costs — in terms of the environment and our children’s futures, so we shift away from these sources to cleaner energy supplies. Secondly, I think regular people like me and my working-class family need to have help making the transition.”
Read the op-ed.

#6: Bloomberg Businessweek: Is This How to Sell Americans on Fighting Global Warming?

“The bill would require companies to have permits to produce or import carbon-containing fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas. The permits, instead of being allocated politically, would be auctioned off by the government, so they would get into the hands of the emitters who need them the most. A similar auction system drastically reduced emissions of sulfur dioxide—which causes acid rain—quicker and cheaper than experts expected.”
Read the full Bloomberg story.

#7: CCL Legislative Update: Rep. Van Hollen introduces cap-and-dividend bill

“The introduction of this legislation shows that we have moved legislators — especially Democrats — a long way toward revenue-neutrality in carbon pricing, as well the concept of returning revenue to households as dividends. This is an important step forward as we seek bi-partisan legislation, and we’re thrilled with Van Hollen’s bill from that standpoint.”
Read the CCL update.

#8: With Liberty and Dividends For All book review: Use Common Wealth to Reduce Inequality

“One beauty of his proposal is that the income everyone receives would come with­out poli­tical or psychological stigma. The dividends couldn’t be criticized as reck­less govern­ment spending or money taken through taxation. Nor could they be called a handout to the ‘unde­­serv­ing poor.’ Dividends from common wealth would be a universal birthright, and that is a big part of their appeal. Chase down a copy of With Liberty and Dividends for All. It will challenge many of your assump­tions about what we can accomplish within a market economy and within the framework of the commons. The reverberations from this short, readable and profoundly original book will be heard for years to come.”
Read the full review.
CCAN encourages readers of Pricing Carbon, Paying Dividends to distribute it to others who might be interested. We welcome input on the contents of this publication and ideas for what could be included.
Send to Ted Glick at ted@chesapeakeclimate.org.

A 40% Clean Electricity Standard Would Put Maryland on the Cutting Edge

CCAN and our partners will be fighting over the next year to double Maryland’s commitment to clean electricity. Burning dirty coal, oil and gas for electricity remains the single largest source of statewide greenhouse gas emissions, and so it’s essential that Maryland transitions as quickly as possible to clean, non-polluting sources. Our state’s current requirement is 20% clean electricity by 2022, and we want to double that to 40% by 2025. This 40% clean electricity standard would put Maryland on the cutting edge of renewable energy policy, and it would go a long way toward increasing national momentum behind a clean energy economy.
A 40% clean electricity standard for Maryland would incentivize enough clean energy capacity to offset about 10 coal-fired power plants, and it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by over 9.7 million metric tons per year. That’s the carbon equivalent of taking 2 million passenger vehicles off the road every year, which will deliver improved public health outcomes, cleaner air and cleaner water for Maryland and our region.
This 40% clean electricity standard for Maryland is ambitious, and in fact it is eminently achievable. The operators of our regional electricity grid recently released a study that examined the grid impacts of doubling current clean electricity levels in states in our region over the next decade. They included the cost of coping with the intermittency of wind and solar as well as the costs of major transmission upgrades that would likely be needed. The very good news is that the study concluded that grid “will not have any significant issues” if each state doubled its own clean electricity standards. In fact, the study found that we would reap significant benefits by accelerating our clean electricity generation, including maintenance of reliability, reduced emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants, and lower energy costs.
So, Maryland can and should get to 40% clean electricity as soon as we can, and that’s what we’ll be pushing for in the coming months. Stay tuned for updates and ways to get involved, and check out more on the campaign here: http://chesapeakeclimate.org/maryland/40-percent-rps/